Contact us

What’s holding enterprises back from agentic AI?

July 13, 2026

Agentic AI has already moved into the rhythm of daily work, helping teams research, plan, coordinate and more. Across product, engineering, digital, data and operations teams, it is increasingly becoming part of how work gets done.

Valtech’s latest report, The Agentic Age, shows how far this shift has already moved. Based on a survey of 1,003 professionals using AI in work-related contexts, it shows that 86% of respondents say AI has improved their productivity by at least 10% and 79% say AI is already having a notable impact on their team’s ability to achieve business goals.

Yet as AI adoption accelerates, many organizations are finding that the biggest barriers to scaling its value lie not in the technology itself, but in the systems, workflows and governance around it.

That makes the current enterprise challenge more interesting than a simple adoption story.

The key question is whether organizations can absorb the value AI is creating and turn it into connected, governed and measurable business performance.

Teams are moving faster but the systems around them were designed for a slower operating model. Workflows still depend on familiar handoffs. Governance still sits outside the flow of work. Decision rights are often unclear. Data and tools remain fragmented. And measurement still tends to reward visible activity over durable impact.

The result is a new kind of gap

Enterprises have not yet clearly defined where AI can assist, where it can act, where it must escalate and where humans must remain accountable.

That boundary now matters because agentic AI is different from the AI most organizations first adopted. It does not only produce drafts, summaries or recommendations. It can coordinate steps, trigger workflows, interact with systems and move work forward. The opportunity is significant, but so is the management question: how do leaders redesign work when AI is ready to do more than help?

Agentic AI challenges: value is moving faster than workflows

One of the key agentic AI challenges is that productivity gains are appearing inside tasks, while the wider workflow often remains unchanged. A product manager can use AI to draft requirements faster, but still wait for the same approval cycle. A QA team can generate test cases in minutes, while release governance still depends on manual checks and fragmented reporting. A service team can summarize customer issues instantly, but still struggle to resolve them if the systems behind the experience remain disconnected.

This is the pattern many enterprises are now experiencing: new speed inside old flow. AI helps individuals and teams move faster, but the work still passes through structures designed for a pre-agentic organization. The result is useful local progress, but not yet a fundamentally better way of operating.

That makes productivity a useful but incomplete measure. If an individual saves time but the next step still sits in a queue, the business has not captured the full value. If teams generate better outputs but decisions still depend on unclear ownership, the organization has not become more adaptive. If AI improves one workflow but cannot connect to the systems that trigger action, the value remains trapped.

The Agentic Age report makes this gap visible.

Only one in four respondents say AI is integrated across workflows, tools and teams, or is helping coordinate work end to end. At the same time, 77% want AI to play a greater role in connecting work across teams and systems. That is a clear signal: the workforce is ready for more connected ways of working, but most organizations have not yet built the operating conditions to support them.

This is how organizations drift into pilot purgatory. Pilots prove that AI can create value in a controlled context, but they do not prove that the enterprise is ready to scale that value through live systems, real governance, risk controls, dependencies and accountability. Experimentation is necessary, but it becomes limiting when it replaces the harder work of redesigning how work is planned, connected, approved and measured.

The more useful leadership question is no longer, “Where are we using AI?” It is, “Where does AI-created value get stuck?” In many organizations, the answer sits between teams, tools, approvals, data flows and decision rights that were never designed for agentic execution.

Agentic AI barriers: the system around the tool is the bottleneck

The biggest agentic AI barriers are not only technical. They are structural, operational and organizational. Enterprises rarely stall because they lack another AI tool. They stall because AI is being introduced into systems of work that were not designed for agents to coordinate, execute or escalate across them.

Agentic AI creates value when it has context, permission and connection. It needs access to the right data. It needs to operate across tools. It needs clear rules for when it can act and when it must escalate. It needs workflow ownership, governance, enablement and metrics that tell teams whether the work is actually improving. Without those conditions, AI remains useful but fragmented.

That fragmentation is already visible in many enterprises. One team uses AI for documentation. Another uses it for analysis. Another uses it for code generation, testing, content or reporting. Each use case may be valuable, but the organization still lacks a connected system of work. The value is real, but it remains local.

The workforce is already signaling what needs to change. When asked what would unlock the most value from AI, respondents prioritized integration of tools and data, governance and guardrails, and clearer human-versus-AI decision rights. Only 4.3% believe more AI pilots would unlock the most value.

That is a strikingly practical message. Teams are asking for the foundations that allow AI to work consistently where it already makes sense. They want the enterprise to connect the capabilities that already exist, rather than keep adding disconnected experiments.

Agentic AI risks: autonomy without accountability

The agentic AI risk conversation often starts with security, privacy, compliance, hallucination, bias and model reliability. But one of the most important risks is a management risk: autonomy without accountability.

As AI becomes more agentic, the problem is whether the organization has defined where it should act, where it should recommend, where it should escalate and where humans must retain final authority.

The report shows that teams are not rejecting AI taking on more work. In fact, 74% are comfortable with AI taking on bounded execution if humans remain accountable. At the same time, respondents draw clear lines around final approval, people decisions, strategic decisions and ethical or risk-sensitive decisions, all areas where human control remains highly valued.

This is not resistance to AI. It is a sophisticated view of where judgment still matters. Teams are increasingly comfortable with AI handling execution, coordination, repetition and preparation. They are far less comfortable handing over decisions that affect customers, employees, risk, ethics, architecture, strategy or accountability.

Agentic AI requires decision-specific governance designed into the workflow itself. Every important workflow should make clear what AI can access, where it can assist, where it can act, when it must escalate, what gets logged, who reviews outcomes and who remains accountable when something goes wrong. When governance is built into the workflow, it creates the confidence teams need to move faster.

Agentic AI opportunities: remove friction, unlock value

Removing the friction that prevents organizations from adapting, deciding and delivering at speed is critical.

The report shows that professionals want AI to assist where work gets stuck. 82% say at least one-fifth of team time is spent on repetitive, rule-based work that could be automated. The strongest demand is for AI to remove repetitive steps, speed execution, improve quality and connect tasks, tools and teams.

Every enterprise has an invisible backlog of friction: repeated checks, slow approvals, duplicated reporting, etc. These are the places where speed, quality and responsiveness are lost. Agentic AI can help because it is suited to the connective tissue of work such as summarizing, monitoring and escalating. But the value only compounds when leaders redesign workflows around the moments where AI can remove drag.

The opportunity goes beyond efficiency. 79% of respondents want more time for judgment and higher-value work. When asked how they would use time freed by AI, they pointed to strategy and direction setting, quality improvement, better decision-making, experimentation, innovation and customer understanding.

That is the real productivity dividend. More capacity for the work that differentiates the business. If AI removes low-value execution and coordination, but the organization fills that time with more meetings, low-priority tasks or reporting, the larger opportunity disappears.

This is where agentic AI becomes a growth conversation, not just an efficiency conversation. The report found that 89% believe better AI-enabled workflows would expand what their organization can deliver. The prize is a more adaptive enterprise, where information moves faster, decisions are better supported and people have more space to apply judgment where it matters.

What leaders should do now

The next phase of agentic AI will be won by organizations that turn AI from scattered assistance into governed execution, treating today’s blockers as a roadmap for how the enterprise needs to evolve.

  • Start with the places where work slows down

These workflow moments reveal where agentic AI can create immediate momentum without becoming another disconnected layer.

  • Define the authority boundary

Make explicit where AI can assist, where it can act, where it must escalate and where humans retain final decision rights.

  • Connect tools, data and workflows

The goal is not another point solution, but a connected system where AI can operate across the flow of work.

  • Turn saved time into strategic capacity

Leaders need to deliberately redirect capacity toward quality, experimentation, innovation, decision-making and customer understanding.

  • Measure AI by outcomes, not activity

Measure AI maturity by quality, speed, decision-making, delivery capacity, adaptability, cost-to-serve, customer relevance and business-goal achievement.

From AI use to AI advantage

Enterprises need to move from scattered AI use to scalable advantage by designing the operating model around AI: integrated tools and data, clear decision rights, workflow redesign, governance, enablement, metrics and ownership. This is how isolated productivity gains become a more durable source of business performance.

The organizations that lead will redesign how people, agents, systems and decisions work together.

The Agentic Age

Get the full report to see what teams really want from AI now.

Download now

FAQs

  • What is agentic AI?

    Agentic AI can plan, coordinate and execute multi-step work across tools, systems and workflows within defined guardrails, helping move work forward while keeping humans accountable for decisions that require judgment.

  • How is agentic AI different from generative AI?

    Generative AI focuses on creating content, summarizing information and responding to prompts. Agentic AI extends these capabilities by coordinating actions across workflows, interacting with enterprise systems and supporting end-to-end processes.

  • What are the biggest risks of agentic AI?

    The greatest enterprise risk is autonomy without accountability. Organizations need clear rules for where AI can assist, where it can act, when it must escalate and where humans retain final responsibility. Governance built into workflows helps teams move faster while maintaining trust, compliance and oversight.

  • How can enterprises deploy agentic AI successfully?

    By redesigning workflows rather than deploying more tools. Organizations should connect data and systems, define clear human and AI decision rights, embed governance into day-to-day work and measure success through business outcomes.

Authors

David Toma
Vice President Strategy & Consulting DACH
Default person placeholder image: minimalist white circular icon resembling a person
Bernd Mündel
Senior Strategist
Bertrand Payet
Composable Practice Director

Let’s connect

Fill in your details and kickstart your transformation journey.

Should you need an alternative format and/or communication support to provide feedback please contact Sheree Atcheson.