Are you giving AI a reason to recommend your brand?

Iva Asche
SVP Adobe Solutions, Valtech

AI often decides which brands get seen and which get promoted, well before a customer reaches an experience those brands control. A shopper asks ChatGPT for a recommendation. A buyer asks Perplexity to compare vendors. In both cases, AI has already decided who's worth mentioning before anyone visits a website.  

This creates a new challenge for brands. Being discoverable is no longer enough. They need to understand what deserves their attention, whether AI considers them relevant and how to respond when it doesn't. 

Signaling brand recommendation-worthiness with The Relevance Loop

The Relevance Loop is Valtech's framework for understanding whether a brand earns AI's attention, trust and recommendation. It's built around three connected questions:

  • What should your brand be relevant for?
  • Where and how does it actually show up in AI's answers?
  • How should your experience ecosystem evolve to respond?

These questions used to belong to three different teams on three different timelines. Marketing leadership owned the first. SEO and brand owned the second. IT and operations owned the third. Treating them separately today is why so many GEO efforts stall before they produce anything measurable.

The signals a brand acts on shape where it shows up in AI. What it learns should influence how its brand experiences evolve. How it responds becomes evidence for what matters next.

That's The Relevance Loop: not three separate audits, but one connected system for prioritizing what matters, understanding where you're considered, responding where needed and learning from what happens.

See what the Relevance Loop looks like inside your organization

The executive briefing takes the framework further: how to prioritize relevance, how to think about AI recommendation, what determines your ability to respond — and six recognizable patterns that can help leadership teams pressure-test each decision and recognize patterns that may deserve a closer look.

The Relevance Loop briefing

Relevance prioritization: What should your brand be relevant for?

Brands have more signal today than they know what to do with: market intelligence, customer data, social conversation and competitor activity.

Add AI discovery data to that list. Brands know what people are actually asking AI and how they appear in the answers alongside their competitors.

But more signal isn't the same as more clarity.

A relevance signal is only worth acting on when three conditions hold at once:

  • Signal momentum — customers, culture or market interest is meaningfully shifting.
  • Audience propensity — a specific audience is likely to act on it.
  • Brand authority — the brand has the actual right to compete on it.

Miss any one of the three, and the opportunity isn't ready yet, no matter how loud the signal is.

Putting prioritization into practice

Valtech's proprietary intelligence tool brings together external market and social signals with customer surveys, existing first-party data and other data sources to identify emerging opportunities, the audiences with the highest propensity to engage and then translates that intelligence into an actionable marketing brief.  

Paired with Adobe Brand Visibility's AI and search intelligence, this forms a decision layer for identifying which opportunities are relevant, credible and worth pursuing.  

Explore

AI recommendation: Where and how does your brand actually show up in AI answers?

Before most customers arrive at a brand-owned experience, AI has already decided which sources it trusts enough to mention.

Being mentioned isn't the same as being recommended. Brands move through four conditions, and each one poses a different question:

  • Presence: Does AI recognize the brand at all?
  • Accuracy: Is what AI says about the brand correct and current?
  • Authority: Is the brand trustworthy enough to cite?
  • Preference: Does AI recommend the brand over competitors?

AI can get your brand's facts right without ever citing you, and cite you without recommending you. GEO does not end when AI gets your facts right. The goal is to become the option AI recommends. Understanding where your brand stands today is a useful place to start.

Execution capacity: How should your experience ecosystem respond?

Knowing what needs to change doesn't mean an organization can change it quickly. Every fix, large or small, has to serve two audiences at once: the people engaging with an experience and the AI systems interpreting, citing and recommending it on their behalf.

Not every fix costs the same. Some optimizations deploy directly at the edge, in front of AI agents, with no CMS change and no engineering sprint. Others require real change — to content, site structure, components or the underlying platform — and move through the full pipeline : briefing, design, development, approval, localization and publishing. Friction builds at every handoff.

If a fix is structural, two things must be true at once:

  • First, the platform has to absorb new requirements without each one becoming its own project. Modernization should make an experience easier to evolve for both human and AI-driven interactions, not just move it to newer architecture. The measure of successful modernization isn't simply what you migrate. It's what becomes easier to change afterward.
  • Second, the organization must treat this as an operating-model problem, not just a technology one. No single team controls AI citations: marketing, brand, content, comms, CX and technology all shape how a brand is discovered, understood and experienced, and someone still has to decide who owns the priorities . As AI expands what organizations can create, connecting that work across teams matters more than ever, so more capacity doesn't just create more complexity.

Migration or more content isn't the goal. Lowering the cost of change is, so when relevance shifts the organization can shift with it.

Putting this into practice with Adobe

Adobe Brand Visibility shows where your brand is gaining or losing ground in AI-driven discovery and where to act. It can deploy certain optimizations directly at the edge. When deeper change is needed, Valtech brings strategy, implementation and AI-assisted migration accelerators to help evolve the underlying experience, reducing effort, time and cost. We also help connect the teams, workflows and governance needed to make that change stick. Adobe provides the platform. Valtech helps turn its potential into lasting change.

Explore our partnership with Adobe →

How the loop closes

Relevance isn't fixed; it's continuous. The loop closes when experience-level changes inform relevance signals.

The whole system is dynamic. Customer behavior changes, competitors respond, AI models update their own sense of who's trustworthy. Outcomes must feed back into what gets prioritized next, or an organization ends up relearning the same lesson every quarter.

Adobe Brand Visibility connects GEO actions to changes in AI visibility, while Adobe Analytics and Customer Journey Analytics connect AI-driven engagement to downstream conversion and commercial outcomes. Signal OS brings that evidence back together with market and social signals, customer research, first-party data and audience intelligence.

The result is a richer view of what worked, for whom and whether the original signal still deserves attention.

If you haven't explored the executive briefing yet, discover six patterns that reveal where the Relevance Loop can become disconnected — and the questions worth asking next.

Frequently asked questions

  • What's the difference between AI visibility and AI recommendations?

    AI visibility tells you whether your brand appears in an AI answer. Recommendation goes further: is your brand represented accurately, supported by sufficient authority and ultimately preferred over competitors? A brand can be highly visible without being one AI recommends.

  • What counts as a signal worth acting on?

    One that shows real momentum, has a specific audience likely to act on it and sits inside territory the brand has an actual right to compete in. A trend that fails any one of those three tests isn't ready to act on yet, no matter how much attention it's getting.

  • Is a structural fix always necessary OR Does every AI visibility gap require a technology change??

    No. Some AI visibility gaps can be addressed through optimization at the edge, without changing the CMS or scheduling an engineering sprint. Others point to deeper issues in the content, site structure, components or underlying platform. Those take longer, but they're also the fixes that hold up over time.  

    And sometimes the constraint isn't technology at all. It's the workflow required to prioritize, create, approve and scale the change. 

    The important decision is knowing whether to optimize the surface, evolve the experience, or change how the work gets done. 

  • Does this apply outside consumer brands?

    Yes. B2B buyers research vendors through AI the same way consumers research products. The three questions don't change. What changes is who the audience is and what "authority" looks like in that category.

  • Where should a brand start?

    With whichever of the three questions it can't answer with confidence today. Most organizations can answer one. Very few can answer all three.

  • Who owns this inside an organization?

    No single team, which is the point. Marketing, brand, content, comms, CX and technology each shape a different part of the loop. Fixing one condition without coordinating the others usually just moves the gap somewhere else.

Download the report